Swing Trade Thesis #1: MSFT Going to 420+
I had a strong conviction that MSFT would move like AAPL did last week— that MSFT is going over 420. My plan? Snag the 417.50c for as cheap as possible, with a goal entry of 0.25.
I watched as MSFT contracts dipped to 0.27, then 0.30, then 0.35—but my 0.25 orders didn’t fill.
The real emotional moment hit when MSFT rallied to 1.10, then dipped back to 0.70. At that point, I knew 0.25 wasn’t happening. Do I “chase” or fold?
I had a decision to make. My plan was to grab 100 contracts with a sub-0.35 average, but I only had 35 contracts with 0.32 average. I wasn’t getting my dream fill, so I placed a dip order to double up at 0.58, risking $600
Outcome:
MSFT broke out of consolidation from under 412 and ripped to 415. Contracts hit $2 by the close.
Pre-market update: MSFT hit 419 and is currently sitting at 417—the thesis is playing out!
THT PRO members already knew to get in on this — on Tuesday, I told them I had orders at 0.30. Imagine how they feel seeing their position run to 2.00 yesterday and this morning seeing the gap up to 419!! What a swing trade!
Day Trade Thesis #2: SPX Will Reach 6145
Using my SPX levels, I was targeting SPX 6145 and SPY 612.50+. But first, I needed a backtest of SPY 609.25 to get my ideal $1-$1.50 entry.
I entered at 3, got stopped out, then re-entered at 2.80.
My goal? 6130c hitting $13-$15. My first profit targets were 6 and 8.
Outcome:
Round 1: SPX 6130 hit 10, I took profit at 9, then set reload orders at 2.
Round 2: SPY retested VWAP, THT PRO members jumped in at 3—but I missed it. I wanted a double bottom on vwap. Do I “chase” or fold? I chased back in at 5 with smaller size. This time, SPX ran to 18.
Not quite the 300% gain I wanted, but still almost 200% on the chase. I was too cheap at $2, but the play still worked out.
I love that members don’t wait for me to alert entries. They’ve learned the process and take action without fear! Members posted they jumped in at $3 for the reload!
Day Trade Thesis #3: SMCI will reach 63.70+
Using my SMCI levels, I was targeting 63.70. But first, I needed a backtest of the previous close at 56. This would result in a measured move to 64+
I wanted to get in on 60c on gap fill, but was looking away. Do I “chase” or fold?
I entered 62c at 1.75 stops at 1.25, after I saw it basing above vwap
My goal? 62c hitting $4.50-7.
Outcome:
We got 4.5 and 6.20
Risked 0.50 and made over $3.50 for over 7R
Not quite the 300% gain I wanted, but still over 200%.
I love that members joined this idea when I said I like SMCI long and how it is basing over vwap. One member messaged me saying he took SMCI 60c on the gap fill. Those went up over 500% congrats!
Key Takeaways & Lessons
✅ Near all-time highs, don’t push for the next-level move. (I overtraded the close making 100% gains only)
✅ Automate SPX contract purchases when SPY reaches VWAP on strong trend days. Will test out conditional buy orders at Interactive Brokers.
✅ Scalping for 100% gains is fun but not worth my energy. I want high-probability 200-500% gainer only.
✅ Planning entries and exits for systematic profits simply works and is stress free
If you weren’t in the group, you were probably scrambling to figure out what was happening. If you were? You had the playbook before the market even moved.
Final Thoughts
The day felt zen-like. Planning, patience, and execution did the heavy lifting—entries were the real work, exits took care of themselves. Edge Planner did a great job ensuring collecting profits consistently.
But… the VWAP entry miss still stings. The lesson? The market rewards patience, but it also punishes being too cheap.
Yesterday’s trades aren’t hindsight—they are from planning, and members knew it. If you don’t want to keep playing catch-up, it’s time to level up. Join us before the next move sets up.
I’d love to hear your war stories—drop them in the comments!
This is a great example of how you can make money with options even when wrong due to spikes in premium, and why I preach set your sell orders in advance systematically.
Did MSFT reach 420+... NO. Did MSFT 417.50c reach $3.50? YES
If right at end of week. and 420 is reached the 417.50c have an intrinsic value of 2.50 and lets say 0.50-1 time and volatility premium boost based on timing. So set sell order above $3!
I was wrong about 420, I was right about 10x. 0.30*10 = 3 + 0.30 cost (I want 10x to be happy). set sell orders for 80% at 3.30. That's how I set it. Sure could have got to 6 or 8. But I assume I will get 10x and I would be dumb not lock that result in.
(Trust me I bitch and moan when I miss 20-30x, but my account is still pretty damn happy securing the 10x). This comes down to philosophy and hard math. I can say get 10x 60% of the time on these planned moves, but 20x only 5% of the time. Over time ALWAYS securing 10x is the way to go. and if I get 5x 85% of the time, locking 20% to make it risk free imho is cheap insurance. The goal is to not lose money, and let the winners pay you. The question then comes down to volume. How often can one identify these opportunities.
THT PRO Members that have been with me for awhile would love your observations on this repeatability... @Boro @MoBizzy
When your original entry at 0.25 didn’t fill—what specific factors or signals led you to decide to chase the trade by doubling up at 0.58, and how do you manage the increased risk when deviating from your initial plan?